Covector Fields on Smooth Manifolds

Def: A (local or global) section of T∗M is called a covector field or differential 1-form. Like sections of other bundles, covector fields without further qualifications are assumed to be merely continuous; when we make different assumptions, we use rough vector field and smooth vector field. In any smooth local coordinates on an open subset U⊆M, a rough covector field ω can be written in terms of the coordinate covector fields (dxi) as ω=ωidxi for n functions ωi:U→R called the component functions of ω. They are characterised by $$\omega_i(p) := \omega_p\left(\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\right\rvert_p\right).$$
If ω is a rough covector field and X is a vector field on M, then we can form a function ω(X):M→R by $$\omega(X)(p) := \omega_p(X_p),\qquad p\in M. $$If we write ω=ωidxi and X=Xj∂/∂xj in terms of local coordinates, then ω(X)=ωiXi.

Smoothness Criteria for Covector Fields: Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary, and let ω:M→T∗M be a rough covector field. The following are equivalent:

Coframes

Def: Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary, and let U⊆M be an open subset. A local coframe for M over U is an ordered n-tiple of covector fields (ε1,…,εn) defined on U such that (εi|p) forms a basis for Tp∗M at each p∈M. If U=M, it is called a global coframe.

For any smooth chart (U,(xi)), the coordinate covector fields (dxi) constitute a local coframe over U, called a coordinate coframe.

Def: Given a local frame (E1,…,En) for TM over an open subset U, there is a uniquely determined (rough) local coframe (ε1,…,εn) over U such that (εi|p) is the dual basis to (Ei|p) for each p∈U, or equivalently εi(Ej)=δji. This coframe is called the coframe dual of (Ei). Conversely, if we start with the local coframe (εi) over an open subset U⊆M, there is a uniquely determined local coframe (Ei), called the frame dual to (εi), determined by εi(Ej)=δji.

Lemma: Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary. If (Ei) is a rough local frame over an open subset U⊆M and (εi) is its dual coframe, then (Ei) is smooth iff (εi) is smooth.

Given a local coframe (εi) over an open subset U⊆M, every rough covector field ω on U can be expressed in terms of the coframe as ω=ωiεi for some functions ω1,…,ωn:U→R, called the component functions of ω with respect to the given coframe. The component functions are determined by ωi:=ω(Ei) where (Ei) is the frame dual to (εi).

Coframe Criterion for Smoothness of Covector Fields: Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary, and let ω be a rough covector field on M. If (εi) is a smooth coframe on an open subset U⊆M, then ω is smooth on U iff its component functions with respect to (εi) are smooth.

We denote the C∞-module of all smooth covector fields on M by X∗(M).

Differential of a Function

Def: Let f be a smooth real-valued function on a smooth manifold M with or without boundary. We define a covector field df, called the differential of f, by $$df_p(v) := vf, \qquad v\in T_p M. $$
Prop: The differential of a smooth function is a smooth covector field.

Let (xi) be smooth coordinates on an open subset U⊆M, and let (λi) be the correspinding coordinate frame on U, the corresponding coframe of (∂/∂xi). If we write dfp=Ai(p)λi|p for some functions Ai:U→R; then $$A_i(p) = df_p\left(\left.\frac{\partial}{\partial x^i}\right\rvert_p\right) = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x^i}(p).$$This means that$$df_p = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x^i} (p)\lambda^i|_p.$$If we apply this identity to the the special case in which f is one of the coordinate functions xj:U→R, we obtain that$$dx^j|_p = \frac{\partial x^j}{\partial x^i}(p)\lambda^i|_p = \delta^j_i \lambda^i|_p = \lambda^j|_p.$$In other words, the coordinate covector field λj is none other than the differential dxj, which explains the notation so far used, and a nice formula for the differential of a function in terms of local coordinates $$df = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x^i} dx^i. $$
Prop: Suppose M is a smooth n-manifold, p∈M, and y1,…,yk are smooth real valued functions defined on a neighbourhood of p∈M.

Properties of the Differential: Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary, and let f,g∈C∞(M).

Functions with Vanishing Differential: If f is a smooth real-valued function on a smooth manifold M with or without boundary, then df=0 iff f is constant on each components of M.

Derivative of a Function Along a Curve: Suppose M is a smooth manifold with or without boundary, γ:J→M is a smooth curve, and f:M→R is a smooth function. Then the derivative of the real-valued function f∘γ:J→R is given by $$(f\circ \gamma)'(t) := df_{\gamma(t)}(\gamma'(t)). $$

Prop: For a real-valued function f:M→R, we have that p∈M is a critical point of f iff dfp=0.

There might be a little bit of a problem since the differential for a smooth real-valued function f:M→R is a little ambiguous. We can think of it as the linear transformation from dfp:TpM→Tf(p)R and the covector dfp:TpM→R, but in reality they are the same. We only need to do the canonical identification of Tf(p)R with R.

Def: Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and p∈M. Let ℓp denote the subspace of C∞(M) consisting of smooth functions that vanish at p, and let ℓp2 be the subspace of ℓp spanned by functions of the form fg for some f,g∈ℓp.

Prop: f∈ℓp2 iff in any smooth local coordinates, its first first-order Taylor polynomial at p is zero. Because of this we say that a function in ℓp2 is said to vanish to second order.

Prop: The map Φ:ℓp→Tp∗M by setting Φ(f):=dfp. We see that restriction Φ to ℓp2 is zero, and that Φ descends to a vector space isomorphism from ℓp/ℓp2 to Tp∗M.

In some treatments of smooth manifold theory, Tp∗M is defined first in this way, and the then TpM is defined as the dual space (ℓp/ℓp2)∗.

Lagrange Multipliers: Let M be a smooth manifold, and let C⊆M be an embedded submanifold that admits a global defining function Φ:M→Rk. Let f∈C∞(M), and suppose p∈C is a point at which f attains its maximum or minimum value among points in C. Them there are real numbers λ1,…,λk (called Lagrange multipliers) such that $$df_p = \sum_{n = 1}^k\lambda_n d\Phi^n|_p.$$
The proof of this relies on the fact {dΦ1|p,…,dΦl|p} forms a basis for the annihilator of TpC. A critical point of f|C must have a vanishing differential, then d(f|C)p must be an element of the annihilator of TpC when seen as subspace of TpM.

Pullback of Covector Fields

Def: Let F:M→N be a smooth map between smooth manifolds with or without boundary, and let p∈M be arbitrary. The differential dFp:TpM→TF(p)N yields a dual linear map $$dF_p^: T_{F(p)}^ N \to T_p^M,$$called the pointwise pullback by F at p, or the cotangent map of F. We see that dFp∗ is characterised by $$dF_p^(\omega)(v) := \omega(dF_p(v)), \qquad \text{for }\omega\in T^*_{F(p)} \text{ and } v\in T_p M.$$
We see that the assignments (M,p)↦Tp∗M and F↦dFp∗ yield a contravariant functor from the category of pointed smooth manifold to the category of real vector spaces. The convention of calling elements of T∗M 'covariant vectors' is particularly unfortunate.

Def: Given a smooth map F:M→N and a covector field ω on N, we define the a rough covector field F∗ω on M, called the pullback of ω by F, by $$(F^\omega)_p := dF^p(\omega). $$It acts on a vector v∈TpM by $$(F^\omega)p(v) := \omega (dF_p(v)). $$
Prop: Let F:M→N be a smooth map between smooth manifold with or without boundary. Suppose u is a continuous real-valued function on N, and ω is a covector field on N. Then $$F^
(u\omega) = (u\circ F)(F^\omega). $$If in addition u is smooth, then $$F^du= d(u\circ F). $$
Cor: Let p∈M, and choose smooth coordinates (yj) for N in a nieghbourhood V of F(p). Let U:=F−1[V], which is a neighbourhood of p. We can write a covector field ω in coordinates as ω=ωjdyj, then $$F^
\omega =F^
(\omega_j dy^j) = (\omega_j \circ F) F^*dy^j = (\omega_j\circ F) d(y^j \circ F) = (\omega_j\circ F)dF^j.$$

Prop: Suppose F:M→N is a smooth map between manifold with or boundary, and let ω be a covector field on N. Then F∗ω is a (continuous) covector field on M. If ω is smooth, then so is F∗ω.

Prop: Suppose F:M→N is a diffeomorphism, and let dF∗:T∗N→T∗M be the map whose restriction to each cotangent space Tq∗N is equal to dFF−1(q)∗, then dF∗ is a smooth bundle homomorphism.

Prop: Let Diff1 be the category whose objects are smooth manifolds, but whose only morphisms are diffeomorphism; and let VB be the category whose objects are smooth vector bundles and whose morphisms are smooth vector bundle homomorphisms. Then, the assignment M↦T∗M, F↦dF∗ defined a contravariant functor from Diff1 to VB called the cotangent functor.

Restricting Covector Fields on Submanifold

Suppose M is a smooth manifold with or without boundary, S⊆M is an immersed submanifold with or without manifold, and let ι:S↪M is the inclusion map. If ω is any smooth covector field on M, the pullback ι yields a smooth covector field ι∗ω on S. Let v∈TpS be arbitrary, and compute $$(\iota^*\omega)_p(v) = \omega_p(d\iota_p(v)) = \omega_p(v), $$since dιp:TpS→TpM is just the inclusion map. Thus, ι∗ω is just the restriction of ω to vectors tangent to S. For this reason, ι∗ω is often called the restriction of ω of S. We see that ι∗ω might be zero at a given point of S, even though considered as a covector gield on M, ω might not vanish.

To distinguish the two ways in which we might interpret the statement 'ω vanishes on S', one usually says that ω vanishes along S or vanishes at points of S if ωp=0 for every point p∈S. The weaker condition that ι∗ω=0 is expressed by saying the restriction of ω to S vanishes, or the pullback of ω to S vanishes.