Argument Principle

Argument Principle (Local Ver)

Let Δ⊆C be an open ball and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Δ. If f is a meromorphic on Δ such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}, then

12πi∮γf′(z)f(z)dz=∑j=1nkj⋅n(γ,ai)−∑l=1mhl⋅n(γ,bl)

for all γ⊆Δ∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that is piecewise smooth closed curve

Cor: Let Δ⊆C be an open ball and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Δ. If f is a meromorphic on Δ such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}. If γ⊆Δ∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that is piecewise smooth closed curve and γ~=f∘γ, then

n(γ~;0)=12πi∮γf′(z)f(z)dz=∑j=1nkj⋅n(γ,ai)−∑l=1mhl⋅n(γ,bl)

Cor: Let Δ⊆C be an open ball and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Δ. If f is a meromorphic on Δ such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}. If γ⊆Δ∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that is piecewise smooth closed curve such that n(γ;z) can only take the values of 0 or 1 and γ~=f∘γ , then

n(γ~;0)=(# of zeros−# of poles ) of f trapped by γ

Th (Ahlfors): Let f:Ω→C analytic, z0∈Δ⊆Ω, Δ an open ball, and w0=f(z0). If z0 is a zero of order k of the function g(z)=f(z)−w0 for all z∈Δ, then there exist ε,δ>0 such that w∈Bε(w0)∖{w0} the identity f(z)=w has exactly k solutions in Bδ(z0)∖{z0}. Additionally, we can find δ>0 such that all the soltions of the identity f(z)=w are different from each other.

Cor: Let f:Ω→C analytic and U⊆Ω be an open subset. If f is nonconstant, then f[U]⊆C is an open set.

Cor: Let f:Ω→C analytic. If f is injective in the region Ω, f′(z)≠0 for all z∈Ω

Prop: Let f:Ω→C analytic. If f injective in the region Ω, then the inverse function f−1:f[Ω]→Ω is analytic in f[Ω] (is also a region) and additionally (f−1)′(w)≠0 for all w∈Ω

Prop: Let f:Ω→C analytic and injective in Ω. If z0∈Ω and R>0 such that BR(z0)⊆Ω and γr(t)=reit+z0, with t∈[0,2π] and 0<r<R, then

f−1(w)=12πi∮γrζf′(ζ)f(ζ)−wdζ

Inverse Function Theorem for Analytic Functions

Let f:Ω→C analytic. If z0∈Ω is such that f′(z0)≠0, then there’s r>0 such that f is injective on Br(z0), f[Br(z0)] is open, f−1 is analytic on f[Br(z0)] and

(f−1)′(w)=1f′(f−1(w))≠0

for all w∈f−1[Br(w0)]

Rouché-Gliksberg Theorem

Let f and g be meromorphic functions on the disk Δ⊆C and γ⊆Δ be a piecewise smooth closed curve such that n(γ;z)=0 or n(γ;z)=1 for all z∈Δ∖γ. Let Zf be the number of zeros of f enclosed by γ counted with multiplicities, Pf the number of poles of f enclosed by γ counted with multiplicities, and Zg and Pg be the corresponding ones for the function g. If f and g are such that

|f(z)+g(z)|<|f(z)|+|g(z)|

for all z∈γ, then

Zf−Pf=Zg−Pg

Rouché Theorem

Let f and g be analytic functions on the disk Δ⊆C and γ⊆Δ be a piecewise smooth closed curve such that n(γ;z)=0 or n(γ;z)=1 for all z∈Δ∖γ. Let Zf be the number of zeros of f enclosed by γ counted with multiplicities, Pf the number of poles of f enclosed by γ counted with multiplicities, and Zg and Pg be the corresponding ones for the function g. If f and g are such that

|f(z)−g(z)|<|g(z)|

for all z∈γ, then

Zf=Zg

Hurwitz's Theorem

Let fn,f:Δ→C analytics on the disk Δ and γ⊆Δ be a piecewise smooth closed curve such that n(γ;z)=0 or n(γ;z)=1 for all z∈Δ∖γ. If the the sequence fn converges uniformly to f over γ and f(z)≠0 for all z∈γ, then there exists N∈N such that for all n≥N the functions fn and f have the same amount of zeros enclosed by γ

Prop: Let fn:Ω→C be a sequence of analytic functions such that it converges uniformly to f over any compact set K⊆Ω. If fn(z)≠0 for all n∈N and for all z∈Ω, then f is the constant 0 or f(z)≠0 for all z∈Ω

Argument Principle

Let Ω⊆C be an region and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Ω. If f is a meromorphic on Ω such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}, then

12πi∮γf′(z)f(z)dz=∑j=1nkj⋅n(γ,ai)−∑l=1mhl⋅n(γ,bl)

for any cycle γ⊆Ω∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that is γ∼0(modΩ). This can be done using the Residue Theorem

Cor: Let Ω⊆C be an open ball and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Ω. If f is a meromorphic on Ω such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}. If γ⊆Ω∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that cycle that γ∼0(modΩ) and γ~=f∘γ, then

n(γ~;0)=12πi∮γf′(z)f(z)dz=∑j=1nkj⋅n(γ,ai)−∑l=1mhl⋅n(γ,bl)

Cor: Let Ω⊆C be an open ball and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Ω. If f is a meromorphic on Ω such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}. If γ⊆Ω∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that is cycle such that γ∼0(modΩ) and n(γ;z) can only take the values of 0 or 1 and γ~=f∘γ , then

n(γ~;0)=(# of zeros−# of poles ) of f trapped by γ

We can extend this to get that:

Let Ω⊆C be an region and a1,…,an,b1,…,bm∈Ω. If f is a meromorphic on Ω such that aj is a zero of order kj∈N+, for each j∈{1,…,n} and bl is a pole of f of order hl for l∈{1,…,m}, and let g be analyctic on Ω

12πi∮γg(z)f′(z)f(z)dz=∑j=1nkj⋅n(γ,aj)⋅g(aj)−∑l=1mhl⋅n(γ,bl)⋅g(bl)

for any cycle γ⊆Ω∖{a1,…,an,b1,…,bm} that is γ∼0(modΩ)