Let us note that finite fields must have nonzero characteristic. In this note be a finite subfield with characteristic . Note that the prime field of is isomorphic to .
Obs: The polynomial over has derivative since the field has characteristic . Since the derivative has no roots at all, we see that the polynomial has no multiple roots, and hence it is separable.
Let be any positive integer and consider the splitting field of the polynomial over . Since it is separable, then it has different roots. If ,and be any two roots of this polynomial, then and . This means that . , and (when ) are roots. Hence the set consisting of the distinct roots of over is the splitting field. Since the number of elements is , we have that , which shows that there exist fields of degree over for any .
Let now be a any finite field of characteristic . If is of dimension over its prime subfield , then has elements. Since is a cyclic group of order , we have that for every , so that for every . Since we have seen that the splitting field has order this shows that is the splitting field for . Since splitting fields are unique up to isomorphism, this proves that finite fields of any order exists and are unique up to isomorphism.
Th: Let be finite field. If , then is isomorphic to the splitting field of . We are going to denote this as .
Cor: In , we see that $$x^{p^n-1}-1 = \prod_{\alpha\in \Bbb F_{p^n}^\times} (x-\alpha).$$If we evaluate at , we get the equality $$\prod_{\alpha\in \Bbb F_{p^n}^\times} \alpha = (-1)^{p^n} = -1.$$This is a generalisation of Wilson's Theorem.
Def: Let be a field of characteristic . The map such that is a monomorphism called the Frobenious endomorphism of .
Obs: If is a finite field, then is perfect, meaning, every finite extension is separable
Prop: Let be the Frobenius endomorphism on the field . We see that is an automorphism. If , then , and it is the smallest positive integer that does this.
If we look at the matrix representation of the Frobenius endomorphism in as a -linear transformation, we see that has a minimal polynomial of , and thus has rational form of the form: $$\begin{pmatrix}0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 1 \ 1 & 0 &\cdots & 0 & 0 \ \vdots &\vdots & \ddots& \vdots & \vdots \
0 & 0 & \cdots &1&0 \end{pmatrix} $$
We can see that is a separable, normal extension, thus it is a Galois extension, and , and is an element of , since . This means that , where is the cyclic group or order
Wedderburn's Theorem on Finite Skew-Fields: A finite skew-field is a field.
Prop: Any finite field is isomorphic to for some prime and some integer . The field is the splitting field over of the polynomial , with cyclic Galois group of order generated by the Frobenius automorphism . The subfields of are all Galois over and are in one to one correspondence with the divisors of . That are the fields , the fixed fields of .
Cor: Let be a power of a prime and let be the finite field with elements. Let be the th power of the Frobenius automorphism , called the -Frobenius automorphism. The following statements are true
fixes .
Every finite extension of of degree is the splitting field of over .
Every finite extension of of degree is cyclic with as generator.
The subfields of the unique extension of degree are in bijective correspondence with the divisors of .
Cor: The irreducible polynomial is reducible modulo every prime .
Prop: If such that and are not perfect squares, then , or is a square in for every prime . This happens because of the law of quadratic reciprocity.
Cor: Let with , is a biquadratic extension and that , where are integers. Then has degree , but is reducible modulo every prime . This is impart because either , or is a square in .
Cor: If such that and are not perfect squares, then polynomial $$(x^2-a)(x^2-b)(x^2-ab)$$has no roots in , but it has at least one root in , for every prime . Prop: The finite field is simple. In particular, there exists an irreducible polynomial of degree over for every .
Prop: Let be the number of irreducible polynomials of degree in . Then $$p
{ #n}
= \sum_{d\mid n}d\psi(d), $$and by Möbius inversion formula, we have that $$ n \psi(n) = \sum_{d \mid n }\mu(d) p^{n/d}, \quad \text{or}\quad \psi(n) =\frac1n \sum_{d \mid n }\mu(d) p^{n/d} $$
We have seen that is a field extension iff . In particular, given two finite filds and there is a third finite field containing an isomorphic copy of them, namely, . This gives us a partial ordering on these fields and allows us to think in their direct limit, since is a directed set. Since these give all the finite extensions of , we see that the limit of for all is an algebraic closure of , unique up to isomorphism: $$\overline{\Bbb F_p} = \varinjlim_{n\in\Bbb N⁺} \Bbb F_{p^n}.$$This provides a simple description of the algebraic closure of .