Simplicial complexes were invented in the hope that they would enable topological questions about manifolds to be reduced to combinatorial questions simplicial complexes.
Def: We define an abstract simplicial complex to be a collection of finite sets, subject to only one condition, to be hereditary.
If is an abstract simplicial complex, the finite sets that make up are called abstract simplices. Given an abstract simplex , any element of is called a vertex of , and any subset of is called a face of . We say is a finite complex if itself it finite, and locally finite complex if every vertex belongs to only finitely many abstract simplices. The dimension of an abstract simplex is one less than the number of elements of . If the dimensions of the abstract simplices of are bounded above, them we say is finite dimensional, and its dimension is the smallest upper bound of the dimensions of its simplices.
Now suppose that and are abstract complexes. Define their vertex sets by $${\cal K}0 := \bigcup{s\in \cal K}, \quad {\cal L}0 := \bigcup{s\in \cal L} s.$$
A map is called an abstract simplicial map if it is of the form for some map , called the vertex map of , that satisfies for every . An abstract simplicial map is called an isomorphism if both and are bijections. In this case is also a simplicial map.
Given a Euclidean simplicial complex , let denote the collection of those finite sets that consist of the vertices of some simplex . It is immediate that is an abstract simplicial complex called the vertex schema of .
Obs: Two Euclidean complexes are simplicially isomorphic iff their vertex schema are isomorphic.
Def: If is a Euclidean simplicial complex vertex schema is isomorphic to , we say that is the geometric realisation of .
Prop: Every finite abstract simplicial complex has a geometric realisation.
Th: An abstract simplicial complex is the vertex schema of a Euclidean simplicial complex iff it is finite-dimensional, locally finite, and countable.
Def: Two simplicial complexes are said to be combinatorially equivalent if they have a common subdivision.
It was conjectured that if two simplicial complexes have homeomorphic polyhedra, they are combinatorially equivalent; this conjecture became known as the Hauptvermutung of combinatorial topology. We know that it is true for all complexes of dimension and for triangulated compact manifolds of dimension , buy false in all higher dimensions, even for compact manifolds.
We can define certain how get subcomplexes. Let be a simplicial complex.
Let , its closure is .
The star of a simplex is .
The link of a simplex is $$\text{lk}(\tau) := {\sigma \in \text{cl}(\text{st}(\tau)) \mid \tau \cap \sigma = \varnothing}.$$