2D Wave Equation

Subjects: Fourier Analysis, Partial Differential Equations
Links: The Wave equation, 3D Wave Equation

We can use the solution of the wave equation in three dimensions leads to a solution of the wave equation in two dimensions

We define the corresponding mean: $$\widetilde M t(F)(x) =\frac1{2\pi} \int{|y| \le 1} F(x-ty) (1-|y|^2)^{-1/2}, dy$$
This is not a spherical mean, but is related being a weighted ball average, since it has a weight function (1y2)1/2.

Let f, g\in \mathcal S(\Bbb R { #2} ), then we would like to solve the problem: $$\Delta u = \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2} \quad \text{subject to} \quad u(x, 0) = f(x) \quad \text{and}\quad \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} (x, 0)=g(x)$$
with this in mind we could just extend f,g to R3 with a mute third variable. This is a good approach, the problem is that if it is constant with respect to the third variable, then those extensions aren't in S(R3)

to solve this problem, let's fix T>0, and consider the function η(x3)S(R), being η(x3)=1, when |x3|3T. Now the functions: $$\tilde f^\flat(x_1, x_2, x_3) = f(x_1, x_2) \eta(x_3) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \tilde g^\flat(x_1, x_2, x_3) = g(x_1, x_2) \eta(x_3)$$
We can see that if we have a function H(x1,x2,x3)=h(x1,x2), then we can get the neat identity $$M_t(H)(x_1, x_2, 0) = \widetilde M_t (h)(x_1, x_2)$$
We can solve the wave equation $$\Delta \tilde u^\flat = \frac{\partial^2 \tilde u^\flat}{\partial t^2} \quad \text{subject to} \quad \tilde u^\flat(x, 0) = \tilde f^\flat(x) \quad \text{and}\quad \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} (x, 0)=\tilde f^\flat(x)$$
Then what we can do know is define the function u(x1,x2,t)=u~(x1,x2,0,t). We know how to calculate u~ it is: $$\tilde u^\flat(x,t) = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(t M_t(\tilde f^\flat)(x)) + t M_t(\tilde g^\flat)(x)$$
We can calculate how would u, the solution to the 2D wave equation by applying our identity, getting that $$u(x,t) = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(t \widetilde M_t(f)(x))+t\widetilde M_t(g)(x)$$

We see that that in the case of n=3, then the solution at the point (x,t) depends only on the data at the boundary of the base of the backward light cone will affect the solution. For the case where n=1,2, we don't see this behaviour, we actually see that the solution at (x,t) depends on the whole base of the backward light cone.